Free to attend, no registration required. Attend in person or watch live on our YouTube channel. Please click here to access the handout.
Mahler’s three volumes of Lieder und Gesänge (1880-1889) comprise the only large collection of songs that the composer did not orchestrate himself: from 1892 onwards, the large majority of his songs were written in at least two performing versions, including for voice-piano and voice-orchestra; and while he returned to orchestrate the earlier Lieder eines fahrenden Gesellen, only a single sketch fragment evidences any intention to similarly return to the Lieder und Gesänge. Given the considerable popularity of Mahler’s orchestral songs since the mid twentieth century, the ‘metamorphoses’ of certain Lieder und Gesänge within Mahler’s symphonic oeuvre, and the sharp rise of song arrangements on the concert stage in the past several decades, it is unsurprising that several later composers and arrangers have produced orchestral versions of the Lieder und Gesänge. This paper explores the reception and arrangement history of the songs through a comparative analysis of four sets of orchestrations, focusing in particular on potential models used by arrangers for their versions, and their varying interactions with ideas of Mahler’s ‘early’ song-writing style.
I turn first to versions of the songs by Colin Matthews and David Matthews (1964/2016) and by Detlev Glanert (2014–15), which I suggest belong to a phenomenon of ‘historically informed arrangement’ – both seem to aim, in different ways, to realise how Mahler might have orchestrated the songs himself. I then consider these versions alongside those by Luciano Berio (1986-7) and Eberhard Kloke (2011), both of which I suggest also belong under the ‘historically informed’ umbrella but which use their ‘historical information’ as means for subversion and play. I also introduce texture graphs of the orchestrations, designed to comparatively visualise different approaches and detect emerging patterns, and incorporate an evaluation of some of the prospects and limitations of this analytical method.
Frankie Perry completed her PhD at Royal Holloway, University of London in 2021, following undergraduate and master’s study at the University of Oxford. Her thesis, titled ‘Lieder Reimagined: Arrangements and Adaptations of Romantic Song in the Twenty-First Century’ was funded by the AHRC and supervised by Julian Johnson. She has chapters forthcoming in Rethinking Brahms and The Lied at the Crossroads of Performance and Musicology, and has reviewed for Nineteenth-Century Music Review and TEMPO. Alongside current main employment at the British Library’s Sound Archive, she writes regular programme notes for Wigmore Hall, and enjoys giving tutorials at her old college, St Anne’s.
OSiMTA Season 5 (2022–23)
We are delighted to announce that the theme for Season 5 is:
Our speakers will be examining this theme from a broad range of analytical and repertorial perspectives. Full details will be posted here soon.
We are also delighted to announce that the majority of seminars will one again take place in person, in the Committee Room of the Oxford Faculty of Music, on selected Wednesdays beginning at 16.30 UK time. We shall also be streaming all sessions via YouTube so that you can watch and join in the discussion online from wherever you are. Details of how to log in will be available shortly. For the most up-to-date information, please visit our dedicated OSiMTA pages.